Read the four cases below and pick one to brief based on the instructions below.Case 1: Reed v. City of Los Angeles.PDFhttps://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2020/b294531.htmlCase 2: Madani v. Rabinowitz.PDFhttps://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2020/b292395.htmlCase 3: Jeppson v. Ley.PDFhttps://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2020/b292166.htmlCase 4: Safechuck v. MJJ Productions Inc..PDFhttps://www.mathenysears.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/09-14-2023-Safechuck-v.-MJJ-Productions-Inc_.pdfHere are instructions for the assignment with the rubric:

WW Practical Assignment #1 There are opinions for four court cases posted on Canvas. Read the four opinions anti pick one to brief. The format and grading rubric are shown below. The assignment must be typed, double-spaced, and 12 point font. This is an individual assignment. Please review the \"COLLEGE POLICIES" section ofthe syllabus. Violation of any of these policies may result in 0 points on the assignment. Learning to brief cases is an important skill for a paralegal. The only way to gain the skill is to practice. The format and grading rubric are as follows: Case Name (2 points) Court, year (2 points) m0? points) The facts refer to what happened prior to the case ending up in court. Include the key facts, in your own words as much as possible. You do not need to include every fact recited by the court. Keep it short and simple. Before you do this section, read the facts several times to develop a picture in your head of what happened. Procedural History (EXTRA CREDIT 5 points) This section states what has happened in court so far, starting with plaintiff ling the case, and ending with how it ended up in this court. Issue (12 points) What is the question before this court'? What does this court have to decide'.' State it as a question or a complete sentence (for example, do not say \"Whether assumption ofrisk applies"). Rule1s1{ 15 points) What relevant rule(s) of law does the court have to apply to make its decision? The court must apply the rule(s) of law to the facts to determine the outcome. Applicationx'Analysis (35 points) How did the court apply the rule(s) to the facts? This section looks at why the court decided the case the way it did. Summarize the court's reasoning, using your own words as much as possible, although it is acceptable to quote from the court's language for key ndings. Conclusion (12 points) What did the court conclude? State the Court's nding. Include the result ofthe finding, for example, \"The court affirmed the lower court ruling." Label and underline the headings for each section (5 points)