Read the instructions carefully before you start the assignment.

This assignment is about summarizing information and presenting opinion about monetary and fiscal policy in Canada. You should use examples as much as possible and cite all sources of information.

Points to concentrate on:

• Summarize the information
• Research external news and articles related to this topic.
• Which is a better tool, Monetary or Fiscal policy?
• Summarize and evaluate your own expectations about economic recovery in Canada. Use relevant information to support your points.
• What are some things that could help the Government of Canada to ensure economy goes back to pre-covid era?
• answer should be relevant to 15% grade

the article are given below:-

Article 1: - Direction of monetary policy in 2022 could depend on how public views Bank of Canada's inflation narrative

Bank of Canada officials spent much of 2021 assuring people that this period of high inflation would be relatively short-lived. The shape of monetary policy next year could depend to a significant degree on whether Canadians continue to believe this narrative.

Since the mid-1990s, households and businesses have generally trusted the central bank to keep inflation low and stable, and have anchored their own predictions for consumer price growth around the bank's 2-per-cent inflation target.

The continuing period of rapid price growth, however, has reignited worries among economists that public expectations could become unmoored. The ultimate fear is wage-price spirals, which drove inflation in the 1970s and 80s. These occur if businesses and employees lose faith in monetary policy and start setting and demanding progressively higher prices and wages in a mutually reinforcing cycle.

Bank of Canada policy makers maintain that medium- and long-term inflation expectations remain close to the central bank's target, and that the pace of inflation will decline over the course of next year as supply chain bottlenecks clear and consumption patterns normalize. But this narrative has become less certain in recent months, and talk about high inflation as a "transitory" phenomenon has disappeared from central-bank communications.

Deputy governor Toni Gravelle warned in a December speech that the longer supply chain problems continue to push up consumer prices, the more likely it is that today's inflation will become entrenched in expectations and wage bargaining. That could lead to a "second round of price increases," he said.

The psychology of inflation matters a great deal to central banks. Economists have long believed that where people think prices are headed has a significant impact on where they end up.

Indeed, monetary policy is often as much about managing expectations as it is about changing interest rates, said Jean Boivin, head of the BlackRock Investment Institute and a former Bank of Canada deputy governor.

"If you can keep inflation expectations anchored, [high inflation] is something that resolves itself," Dr. Boivin said in an interview.

"If people start to expect more [inflation], then we will have a worse outcome for everyone," he said, saying that central banks have historically needed to raise interest rates aggressively to bring runaway inflation expectations back in line, even if this means pushing the economy into a recession.

The most famous example of this was the "Volcker Shock" of the early 1980s, when U.S. Federal reserve chair Paul Volcker wrestled inflation expectations back to the ground with painfully high rates, causing a global slump.

Current signals about inflation expectations are mixed. The Bank of Canada's most recent quarterly business survey, conducted in August and September, found that 45 per cent of respondents believed the rate of inflation would be above 3 per cent for the next two years - the highest proportion since the survey began in 2001.

A separate survey of consumers found that the median projection for the rate of inflation a year from now was 3.7 per cent, the highest since the survey began in 2014.

On the other hand, the majority of businesses surveyed said they believed that the forces pushing up consumer prices were temporary. For consumers, inflation expectations two and five years out remained around 3 per cent. New survey results will be published in January.

"On balance, the evidence from surveys, forecasters and bond markets points to a notable pickup in the one-year outlook on inflation, but no significant shift in longer-term expectations - yet," Bank of Montreal economists Douglas Porter, Benjamin Reitzes and Shelly Kaushik wrote in a note to clients in October, surveying the available data.

"However, the steady upswing in a variety of longer-term U.S.

expectations metrics, the increased public focus on inflation in recent months, and the sustained strength in energy prices all suggest that Canadian expectations may also shift in a more meaningful way," they wrote.

This situation requires deft communications from the central bank. Inflation has become a major topic of everyday conversation, media coverage and political debate, with Conservative politicians regularly haranguing the federal government and the central bank about monetary policy. That provides a volatile backdrop to attempts by the bank to change its narrative about inflation and lay the groundwork for interest-rate hikes, which it expects to begin in the middle quarters of next year.

"If you're the central banker, you want to do everything to convince people that 'we will deliver ultimately on our mandate, you should really expect 2 per cent.' The more you start to communicate that you're worried about that, you're kind of giving credence to those inflation expectation worries," Dr. Boivin said.

The task is complicated by the fact that economists don't have a particularly good grasp of how inflation expectations are actually formed, he said. Central bankers know what it looks like when inflation expectations are well anchored. But their economic models aren't well equipped to determine when expectations are about to come unmoored.

"Central banks are in a tricky situation, because they don't have a good handle on what to look for to start to be worried about inflation expectations.

You need to make sure you avoid it, but you don't know how much flexibility you have," he said.

Luba Petersen, an associate professor of economics at Simon Fraser University, studies how expectations are formed using laboratory experiments. She said that people tend to rely heavily on recent inflation statistics and their own personal experiences when formulating beliefs about inflation.

"They like to overweight, if anything, popular goods that they tend to spend on: so gasoline, meat, rent," Prof. Petersen said. She added that people also tend to focus on real estate prices, despite the fact that the Consumer Price Index, the main measure of inflation, treats owned-accommodation as an asset rather than a consumer good and puts little weight on real estate prices.

With these factors influencing inflation perceptions, central banks need to work doubly hard to keep expectations anchored in periods of rapid price growth and red-hot housing markets.

It doesn't help that central bank forecasts have been shifting during the pandemic. Early on, policy makers were mainly concerned about deflation. As the economy rebounded through the second half of 2020 and 2021, central bankers said high inflation would be "transitory." In November, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem used the awkward phrase "transitory but not short-lived," then dropped the word altogether from the bank's rate decision announcement in December.

Prof. Petersen said the changing narrative is understandable because of complicated and shifting global supply chain dynamics. She said the bank's best course of action is to be clear with Canadians about why its views have shifted.

"I think if they are upfront about it - 'look, that's what lead to unexpectedly more persistent inflation' - I think that Canadians will take that as an acceptable answer and be kind of forgiving of the bank for making these kind of forecasting errors," she said.

Malik Shukayev, an associate professor of economics at the University of Alberta and a former Bank of Canada researcher, echoed this view.

"I think Bank of Canada credibility is not likely to be hurt by a sincere mistake," Prof. Shukayev said.

"Credibility suffers when the policy makers promise something and they do not really do it," he said. "The latest communication was that the Bank of Canada expects to start raising rates in the middle of 2022; if that doesn't happen, then I guess people will start asking questions."

Article 2: - Bank of Canada is close to its policy limits, ex-chief says; Fiscal policy, not monetary, now the key; Economy

Former Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz said monetary policy is near its limits and fiscal policy should be the primary tool for lifting the economy out of the hole created by COVID-19.

The central bank has done most of what it can do, Poloz said during an interview at Bloomberg's virtual Canadian Fixed Income Conference, adding that as the economy returns to normal, cash will flow back into the system and the Bank of Canada's balance sheet will shrink automatically. The main question is how sustainable is the debt being drawn down by governments, he said.

The former governor, who stepped down from the Bank of Canada after his term ended in June and is currently a special adviser at law firm Osler, Hoskin and Harcourt LLP, cited a report on Tuesday by the International Monetary Fund that estimated Canada's general government gross debt will rise to 115 per cent of gross domestic product this year, from 89 per cent in 2019. Policy-makers don't have much experience with such large numbers, but provided interest rates stay low, it's more of a "debt service issue," Poloz said.

"In the end, I think the sustainability criterion can be met, provided the government money's being used for productive reasons, for productive purposes, and therefore enhances the ability of the economy to grow," he said, adding that in real terms, interest rates are likely to stay low for a generation.

Good fiscal policy can help avoid the need for negative interest rates, which is "a good thing for everybody," he said. Daycare is the kind of social infrastructure that, while expensive, could be put in place by the government to help the economy grow in the longer term, said Poloz.

Negative rates have only really been used in economies where fiscal policy was failing to provide a solution, in particular in Europe, Poloz said, adding that while they remain in the central bank's toolkit, monetary policy has already done most of what it can do.

"If there's a little extra juice in that lemon, you want all the juice you can get," he said. "If you're the last person standing, you've got to be doing your utmost."