Read the The Suicide Trap: Bouvia v ap: Bouvia v. Superior Court https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/179/1127.html. and Suicide Trap: Bouvia v.Superior Court https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=llr

• Distinguish between ethical and legal obligations and describe the disparities you observed between the two in this case.
• What ethical theory and theorist would you use to support either side of the case? Choose a theorist for either side and explain how it applies.
• Develop a list of missing or additional information that you would request as a committee member to help shed light on the position for all parties involved.
• Consider the legal ruling on the case. If you were the jury, what would be your decision/recommendation about this case? What would you base your findings on? What facts were presented in the case, in your research, and in the class discussion that support your findings?