Read the transcript of the Grand jury testimony in the Justin Meyers case on pgs 418-22 (Appendix A) of your textbook. Find Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039, 103 S.Ct. 2830, 77 L.Ed.2d 405 (1983), and Davis v. U.S., 564 U.S. 229, 131 S.Ct. 2419, 180 L.Ed.2d 285 (2011).

What are the factual similarities and differences between the cases? Are these differences significant? Have these cases (Davis and Bradshaw) been overruled in subsequent cases? How do you know? Based on the factual and legal issues, what is the prosecution's best argument to admit Meyers' statements? What is the Defendant's best argument to keep the statements out?