Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Read this court case very carefully: Bertha Siliezar v. East Jefferson General Hospital and Dr. Joseph Tamimie. No. 04-CA-939. Decided: January 11, 2005. (See:http://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1094597.html). What

Read this court case very carefully:Bertha Siliezar v. East Jefferson General Hospital and Dr. Joseph Tamimie. No. 04-CA-939. Decided: January 11, 2005.(See:http://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1094597.html).

  1. What do you think about the court ruling regarding the adequacy of verbal consent prior to surgery?
  2. Do you think that the clinicians, in this case, acted reasonably? Ethically?
  3. Discuss several options you could take if a patient refuses to consent to a medical needed procedure?
  4. Explain what you would need to do to comply with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) guidelines in obtaining informed consent.
  5. Discuss the pros and cons of using a family member as an interpreter for an LEP patient.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Human Rights Between Law And Politics

Authors: Petr Agha

1st Edition

1509935738, 978-1509935734

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

=+46. Monthly gas prices, part 3. Using the data from Exercise

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Subjective norms, i.e. the norms of the target group

Answered: 1 week ago