Real estate law I need help in 20 and 21

20-At the time of his death, John's only possession was his house. Title to the house was in John's name alone. John was once married to a woman named Ashley, but the two divorced five years earlier. Despite this, John and Ashley were on friendly terms. John had no other known relatives. While on his deathbed, John told Ashley that he wanted to leave ownership of his house to her. This deathbed conversation was witnessed by John's lawyer, who had been summoned to johns deathbed to draft a will. Unfortunately, John died before the will was properly executed. Two months later, a mysterious woman named Tracy came to town. Tracy identified herself as John's longtime paramour, and she had in her possession a will that John allegedly executed two years earlier. The will stated that 100% ownership of the house was to go to Tracy. It was later discovered that John's lawyer was also representing Tracy at the time of Roger's death. (a) If the Will in Tracys possession is valid, what legal effect will John's deathbed conversation have with regard to the transfer of title to the house? ) (b) If the Will in tracys possession is a fake, who will gain title to John's house?) (c) Regardless of your answers to parts (a) and (b), assume that John and Ashley did not formally divorce (i.e., they just lived separately). What legal effect will this have for Ashley ? (d) If John did not know (or had any reason to suspect) that his lawyer was also representing Tracy, what should have been the proper way for John's lawyer to have handled the situation? 21-Lanna is a real estate broker who was hired by johnny to help johnny buy a new house While Lanna was showing Johnny a potential home, Lanna mistakenly told Johnny that the house was built in 1990 with the latest earthquake-resistant technology. In actuality, the house was built in 1965 without any earthquake-resistant materials. Feeling reassured, Fred bought this house. Two years later, an earthquake struck the area, and Fred's house sustained I extensive damages. (a) Can Lanas statement about the house having been built with the latest earthquake-resistant technology be used by Johnny as the basis of a lawsuit for fraud? (b) Regardless of your answer to part.(a), assume that lanna is found liable to johnny for the damages to his house. Would a court award Fred punitive damages