Recall that in private law, fraud must meet ALL of the following criteria:

• A material fact was misrepresented
• Misrepresentation was intentional
• An injury resulted
• The injured party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation

Based on the criteria for fraud above, do you believe there are grounds to support claims of fraud in this LuLaRoe case study? Why or why not? Which of the criteria above is the most difficult to determine?

https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/ag-ferguson-sues-lularoe-over-pyramid-scheme

This is a link to answer questions