Question
Refer to Scientific glass, Inc.: Inventory Management Case Study analysis This case is about evaluating inventory options and network options for a scientific glass manufacturer
Refer to Scientific glass, Inc.: Inventory Management Case Study analysis
This case is about evaluating inventory options and network options for a scientific glass manufacturer and distributor. The company uses a periodic review inventory control process. For purposes of this assignment, you will work primarily with the two representative products whose characteristics are shown in Exhibit 3. 1)
Your first task is to determine how much (inventory) costs will increase if Scientific Glass chooses to implement (and achieve) a 99% service level vs. the optimal service level that overage and underage costs dictate. To do that, you need to think about: a) The average lot size that will drive each products cycle stock b) The uncertainty as measured by standard deviation of demand over review time and lead time for each product. Note that you have to have safety stock to cover the uncertainty over the combined times. c) Combining inventory costs associated with both cycle stock and safety stock. (Hint: Think back to EOQ, which only deals with cycle stock).
2) Your second task is to compare inventory costs across the various system configurations (central, 2 warehouses, 8 warehouses) and quantify any penalties or savings from one option vs. another. How would y ou evaluate whether the differences are significant or not?
3) Given what you have found out about inventory carrying costs, how would you rate the importance of these carrying costs vs. a) Regional warehousing costs (see bottom of page 12) b) Transportation costs from the regional DCs (Winged Fleet) c) Transportation costs charged by Global Logistics Which of these various costs do you think should drive the decision?
Exhibit 1: Select Income Statement and Balance Sheet Values ($MM) | ||
Income Statement Accounts | 2008 | 2009 |
Net sales | 65.0 | 86.3 |
Expenses | ||
Cost of goods sold | 29.0 | 38.9 |
Sales, general and administrative | 10.1 | 14.0 |
Research and development | 13.5 | 17.0 |
Depreciation | 2.9 | 3.1 |
Other expenses | 0.6 | 1.0 |
Operating expenses | 56.1 | 74.0 |
Interest expense | 2.4 | 3.0 |
Taxes | 2.0 | 2.9 |
Net earnings | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Balance Sheet Accounts | 2008 | 2009 |
Assets | ||
Cash | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Receivables | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Inventory | 4.9 | 8.7 |
Prepaid expenses | 4.8 | 6.1 |
Current assets | 15.9 | 22.2 |
Plant property and equipment | 28.5 | 32.9 |
Other long term assets | 2.7 | 4.3 |
Total long term assets | 31.2 | 37.2 |
Total assets | 47.1 | 59.4 |
Liabilities & Equity | ||
Short term debt | 2.7 | 3.2 |
Accounts payable | 2.3 | 3.0 |
Accrued liabilities | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Current liabilities | 5.4 | 6.7 |
Long term debt | 17.2 | 21.7 |
Owners equity | 24.5 | 31.0 |
Total capitalization | 41.7 | 52.7 |
Total liabilities & equity | 47.1 | 59.4 |
Months of inventory | 2.028 | 2.690 |
Cost of goods sold / sales | 0.446 | 0.451 |
Long term debt / total capital | 0.412 | 0.412 |
Exhibit 2: 2009 Sales by product category | ||||
Product category | Units sold (000's) | Average price ($) | Sales ($ 000's) | % of total sales |
Containers (bottles, flasks) | 2,321 | 15.89 | 36,881 | 43% |
Measuring devices (beakers, pipettes, cylinders) | 1,283 | 8.98 | 11,521 | 13% |
Fittings (stoppers, adapters) | 442 | 11.01 | 4,866 | 6% |
Funnels | 185 | 12.63 | 2,337 | 3% |
Handlers (stirrers, forceps, trays) | 1,732 | 5.89 | 10,201 | 12% |
Tubes | 4,420 | 4.55 | 20,111 | 23% |
Other | 18 | 23.41 | 421 | 0% |
Total | 10,401 | 8.30 | 86,339 | 100% |
Number of orders | 119,855 | |||
Average number of units per order | 87 | |||
Average sales per order | $720.36 | |||
Average weight per order (pounds) | 9.8 |
Exhibit 3: Information on Representative Products | ||
Griffin 500ml Beaker | Erlenmeyer 500ml Flask | |
2009 units sold | 11,268 | 3,389 |
Percent of all units sold | 0.1% | 0.03% |
Annual carrying cost (%) | 14% | 14% |
Unit price | $8.80 | $9.50 |
Unit cost | $3.96 | $4.56 |
Cost of underage | $0.48 | $0.49 |
Cost of overage | $0.021 | $0.025 |
Optimal service level | 95.8% | 95.3% |
Average bi-weekly demand (8 warehouses) | 54.2 | 16.3 |
Standard deviation of bi-weekly demand (8 warehouses) | 21.4 | 10.9 |
Average bi-weekly demand (2 warehouses) | 216.7 | 65.2 |
Standard deviation of bi-weekly demand (2 warehouses) | 38.3 | 19.5 |
Average bi-weekly demand (1 warehouse) | 433.4 | 130.3 |
Standard deviation of bi-weekly demand (1 warehouse) | 51.0 | 26.0 |
Exhibit 5: Weight and shipping costs for typical products (2009) | |||||
Product category | Pounds/case | Units/case | Average price/case | Total pounds shipped in 2009 | Forecast pounds shipped in 2010 |
Containers (bottles, flasks) | 3.00 | 12 | 190.7 | 580,250 | 696,300 |
Measuring devices (beakers, pipettes, cylinders) | 0.75 | 6 | 53.9 | 160,375 | 192,450 |
Fittings (stoppers, adapters) | 1.88 | 20 | 220.2 | 41,438 | 49,725 |
Funnels | 1.88 | 12 | 151.6 | 28,906 | 34,688 |
Handlers (stirrers, forceps, trays) | 0.94 | 20 | 117.8 | 81,188 | 97,425 |
Tubes | 1.25 | 20 | 91.0 | 276,250 | 331,500 |
Other | 0.13 | 1 | 23.4 | 2,250 | 2,700 |
Total | 1,170,656 | 1,404,788 | |||
Shipping costs for Global Logistics and Winged Fleet | |||||
Global Logistics (3-day rates) | Delivery from Atlanta to: | ||||
Weight (pounds) | Southeast | Northeast | Central | Southwest | Northwest |
2.5 | $6.45 | $7.31 | $8.60 | $9.46 | $9.89 |
5 | $10.28 | $11.65 | $13.70 | $15.07 | $15.76 |
10 | $16.69 | $18.91 | $22.25 | $24.48 | $25.59 |
20 | $27.38 | $31.03 | $36.50 | $40.15 | $41.98 |
Winged Fleet | |||||
3-day rates are calculated using region, fixed fee and weight fees | |||||
The regions are West (equivalent to Northwest and Southwest regions for Global Logistics), | |||||
Central, and East (equivalent to Northeast and Southeast regions for Global Logistics) | |||||
Within region fee | $5.00 | ||||
Across 1 region fee | $12.00 | ||||
Across 2 regions fee | $16.00 | ||||
Weight fee | $1.16 | per pound | |||
Shipping Comparison | |||||
Centralized warehousing in Waltham | |||||
Winged Fleet: Waltham warehouse to Dallas customer | $23.60 | ||||
Total | $23.60 | ||||
Decentralized warehousing | |||||
Bulk transport: Waltham to Dallas warehouse | $4.00 | ||||
Winged Fleet: Dallas warehouse to Dallas customer | $16.60 | ||||
Total | $20.60 | ||||
Centralized warehousing in Atlanta with Global | |||||
Bulk transport: Waltham to Atlanta | $4.00 | ||||
Global Logistics: Atlanta to Dallas customer | $22.25 | ||||
Total | $26.25 | ||||
Notes | |||||
Cost for bulk shipments | $0.40 | per pound | |||
Aside from the capital cost to carry inventory in Atlanta, SG would not have any operating costs for Atlanta. | |||||
Global Logistics rates cover warehousing, insurance and delivery costs. | |||||
Regional warehousing costs are 15% of annual inventory in the regional warehouses |
Exhibit 6: Inventory Balance Detail ($MM) | |
December 2009 | |
Raw materials / work in process inventory | 2.18 |
Finished goods inventory | |
Manufacturing site | 0.20 |
North American warehouses and in transit | 4.44 |
Overseas warehouses and in transit | 1.90 |
Total finished goods | 6.54 |
Total inventory | 8.72 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started