Reference Link: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/439/1317/

What is the right to compulsory process? In what way(s) was Dr. Jascalevich's right to compulsory process violated? In what way(s) was it not? Why do you suppose that Jascalevich?s attorney?s fought so hard to get everything Farber had? How might it have been useful to his defense? What other constitutional right did the right to compulsory process come up against? Which took precedent and why? What was New Jersey's shield law? How did it apply to this case? What is "in camera inspection" and how did it apply to this case?