Reference Zahra, S A , Priem, R L , Rasheed, A A (2005) The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud Retrieved from https www researchgate net publication 240249079 The Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management Fraud Answer a few of the following questions and explore some of your own thoughts and ideas in a substantive, original post Are rules and regulations established to protect against management fraud effective If so, why is fraud still so prevalent What else can be done to prevent deter fraud How can you prove intent If someone doesn't intend to commit fraud but nevertheless their actions or inactions lead to fraud, should they be held responsible Do you think society, as a whole, is to blame for top management fraud Compare and contrast conflict theory, differential opportunity, subculture, etc What are your thoughts on the various industry level antecedents the authors discuss Do you agree with the authors assertion that street crime disproportionately victimizes the poor but seems to imply that management fraud doesn't Why

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 22, 2024

Reference: Zahra, S.A., Priem, R.L., & Rasheed, A.A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240249079_The_Antecedents_and_Consequences_of_Top_Management_Fraud Answer a few of the

Reference: Zahra, S.A., Priem, R.L., & Rasheed, A.A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240249079_The_Antecedents_and_Consequences_of_Top_Management_Fraud

Answer a few of the following questions and explore some of your own thoughts and ideas in a substantive, original post.

Are rules and regulations established to protect against management fraud effective? If so, why is fraud still so prevalent? What else can be done to prevent/deter fraud?
How can you prove intent? If someone doesn't "intend" to commit fraud but nevertheless their actions or inactions lead to fraud, should they be held responsible?
Do you think society, as a whole, is to blame for top management fraud?
Compare and contrast conflict theory, differential opportunity, subculture, etc.
What are your thoughts on the various industry-level antecedents the authors discuss?
Do you agree with the authors assertion that street crime disproportionately victimizes the poor but seems to imply that management fraud doesn't. Why?