References

Anderson, R., Berger, B., Krakoof, S., & Frickey, P. (2020) American Indian Law: Cases and Commentary, Ed. 4th California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987)

How did the decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians analyze the distinction between prohibitory and regulatory acts to determine whether the state could control tribal gaming?

What would have been the legal basis for a non-PL-280 state to challenge a tribal gaming enterprise?

If California stopped its lottery and Catholic Bingo, could it have still banned the tribe's activities without PL-280 delegation? Although these questions are no longer relevant due to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, how can they help us understand the legal rules that were previously in place?