1. Relate the pictorial below to your environment. What is the optimal number of participants in a code review? What would be a result of an insufficient participation? Or over-abundant participation?

Effectiveness Peak Lack of expertise Reviewers to cover all are areas intimidated to speak up O Effectiveness = (#defects)(staff*hours) 23- 6 7 8 9 Number Of ParticipantsEffectiveness Peak Not Enough Time Small Large to Thoroughly Medium Size Size Size Examine Asset .* Too Much*Time Enough To Forget where we started. O Effectiveness= (#defects)/(staff*hours) O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Number Of Days Between Distributing Asset and MeetingA Peer Review Plan Review Conduct Review Verify and Close Perform Retrospective Plan for Work Analysis / Audit on Manager Product Review No Review Records Review Dono Follow-up Archive / Sand Consolidate and Announce Work Product for Update Work Author Work Product and Review and Analyze the Product Review Records Schedule review Review Comments in Repository Voating Moderator Conduct Review Meeting Roview Reviewer Work Product and Provide On-line Feedback G Scribe Record the Newing