Relates to Law v. NCAA, 5 F. Supp. 2d 921 (D. Kan 1998)

1. Describe the facts of the case.
2. What was the cause of action?
3. What was the court's disposition of the case?
4. Is an antitrust plaintiff entitled to recover for damages?
5. In economic terms, what was the amount of damages?
6. Once an antitrust violation is established, is the burden of proving damages lessened?
7. Describe the court's willingness to accept a degree of uncertainty in fixing the amount of damages.
8. Do plaintiffs need to establish their damages with mathematical precision?
9. What type of evidence do they need to provide in determining damages?
10. Once the existence of an injury is established, does the proof necessary to set damages need to be exact?