REPORT This Report addresses the legal issues surrounding the injury that occurred in California and what Ron should expect to happen. This report will address the rules regarding the process to be followed, which are typically referred to as (1), and the later section of this memorandum will address the (2) which deal with the respective rights and obligations of the parties. The legal system we have in the United States is (3) borrowed in part from England. Our system differs from other legal systems such as those countries that follow the French System which is known as a (4). The first question that comes to mind is whether Ron can be sued and forced to defend himself in New York? Obviously, Ron lives and is located in California, and the injury occurred in California. Hence, the first question is whether New York has (5), and that will be determined by what rules its legislature has made and whether New York enacted a (6). If New York has, then Ron may be sued in the state court of New York and be forced to defend himself; provided the person suing, which is an issue addressed later, can establish that Ron has sufficient (7) with New York because he once played football for a New York NFL football team or whether the court believes through his Wing Shop restaurants he has availed himself of (8) of doing business in New York because he is also a part owner of a Wing Shop in New York. If he is sued in New York, he will need to be concerned about whether a New York State Court would be unduly sympathetic to a citizen of their state. For that reason, he should determine whether he can have a Federal Court hear the claim based upon the fact that he is a citizen of another state and (9) exists. If both New York and the Federal Court located in New York have the legal authority or power to hear this case, then (10) is said to exist. Another factor influencing what is the proper court in which to adjudicate this case is that the Federal Government has enacted a comprehensive statutory scheme covering food safety. It may be that after closely reviewing this new legislation the matter can only be heard in the Federal Court because it comprehensively legislated in this area, and (11) exists with the Federal Court. JUJUU, VIII VEULIINILULILIVYL motion for summary judgment Answers: motions to exclude/in limine non-binding arbitration Notice of Appeal opening statement order of examination (OEX) peremptory challenges personal property lien personal service plaintiff privileged procedural rules 10 years 10% absolute privilege abstracts of judgment alternative dispute resolution American Arbitration Assoc. arbitration award binding arbitration bond or undertaking cause of action challenge for cause civil law system claim of relief clerk's transcript case law common law system complaint concurrent jurisdiction cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant process server qualified privilege renewed reporter's transcript request to enter default request to produce service by publication service of process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules Concurrent jurisdiction service or process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules substituted service summons the rights and benefits U.S. Constitution cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant deposition direct examination discovery diversity of citizenship due process exclusive federal jurisdiction interrogatories JAMS JNOV judgment by default jurisdiction jury instructions long arm statute mediation verdict voir dire work product privilege writs of execution mediator minimum contracts REPORT This Report addresses the legal issues surrounding the injury that occurred in California and what Ron should expect to happen. This report will address the rules regarding the process to be followed, which are typically referred to as (1), and the later section of this memorandum will address the (2) which deal with the respective rights and obligations of the parties. The legal system we have in the United States is (3) borrowed in part from England. Our system differs from other legal systems such as those countries that follow the French System which is known as a (4). The first question that comes to mind is whether Ron can be sued and forced to defend himself in New York? Obviously, Ron lives and is located in California, and the injury occurred in California. Hence, the first question is whether New York has (5), and that will be determined by what rules its legislature has made and whether New York enacted a (6). If New York has, then Ron may be sued in the state court of New York and be forced to defend himself; provided the person suing, which is an issue addressed later, can establish that Ron has sufficient (7) with New York because he once played football for a New York NFL football team or whether the court believes through his Wing Shop restaurants he has availed himself of (8) of doing business in New York because he is also a part owner of a Wing Shop in New York. If he is sued in New York, he will need to be concerned about whether a New York State Court would be unduly sympathetic to a citizen of their state. For that reason, he should determine whether he can have a Federal Court hear the claim based upon the fact that he is a citizen of another state and (9) exists. If both New York and the Federal Court located in New York have the legal authority or power to hear this case, then (10) is said to exist. Another factor influencing what is the proper court in which to adjudicate this case is that the Federal Government has enacted a comprehensive statutory scheme covering food safety. It may be that after closely reviewing this new legislation the matter can only be heard in the Federal Court because it comprehensively legislated in this area, and (11) exists with the Federal Court. JUJUU, VIII VEULIINILULILIVYL motion for summary judgment Answers: motions to exclude/in limine non-binding arbitration Notice of Appeal opening statement order of examination (OEX) peremptory challenges personal property lien personal service plaintiff privileged procedural rules 10 years 10% absolute privilege abstracts of judgment alternative dispute resolution American Arbitration Assoc. arbitration award binding arbitration bond or undertaking cause of action challenge for cause civil law system claim of relief clerk's transcript case law common law system complaint concurrent jurisdiction cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant process server qualified privilege renewed reporter's transcript request to enter default request to produce service by publication service of process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules Concurrent jurisdiction service or process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules substituted service summons the rights and benefits U.S. Constitution cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant deposition direct examination discovery diversity of citizenship due process exclusive federal jurisdiction interrogatories JAMS JNOV judgment by default jurisdiction jury instructions long arm statute mediation verdict voir dire work product privilege writs of execution mediator minimum contracts