Required information (Business Law Rocks Business law instructor Courtney ordered 50 T-shirts for her classes that said "Business Law Rocks on the front. She wanted to distribute them on the last day of class and contracted with Tyler, who owned a T-shirt business, for the shirts to arrive by that day. The shirts arrived on Thursday, the day before the last class on Friday. Unfortunately, the shirts said "Business Law Yuck" on the front. Tyler told Courtney that he would remedy and fix the problem and that he had the right to do so. She told him, however, that she had to have the shirts the next day because the students would be gone after that. Courtney had also ordered some pamphlets on employment law to be used the next fall semester. The seller had agreed to provide the pamphlets 30 days before spring semester ended. The seller, however, erred and sent pamphlets on environmental law, which arrived 28 days before spring semester ended. The seller attempted to remedy the problem by sending the correct pamphlets on employment law, but they did not arrive until 27 days before spring semester ended. None of the parties had any prior dealings. Which statement is true in regard to the efforts of the seller of the employment law pamphlets to remedy the problem with the incorrect pam Multiple Choice O The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem, The seller could likely exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller would have had reasonable grounds to believe that Courtney would not have objected to the tender of the correct item at the time it was tendered O The seller could not act to remedy the problem because he did not have assurance from Courtney in writing that she would allow additional time in which to cure The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem. The seller could likely exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller would have had reasonable grounds to believe that Courtney would not have objected to the tender of the correct item at the time it was tendered. The seller could not act to remedy the problem because he did not have assurance from Courtney in writing that she would allow additional time in which to cure. The seller could not exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller did not provide prompt notice of his intent to cure and did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender of environmental pamphlets would be acceptable to Courtney. The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 20 days under the UCC to fix any problem Required information Portraits) Tori, a famous portrait painter, agreed to paint Harry's portrait for $4,000. She also agreed to paint the portraits of Gabby's two Corgi dogs, Queenie and Prince Gabby agreed to pay Tori $10,000 for the two Corgi portraits. Tori charged Gabby more because she met the spoiled dogs, and they really got on her nerves. Tori subsequently fell behind on finishing Harry's portrait, so she assigned the right to receive the money for the dog portraits to her assistant, Justin, and delegated the duty to Justin to paint the dog portraits. Justin eagerly accepted, and painted the portraits. Tori also assigned to Justin the right to receive payment from Harry to satisfy various payments she owed him for other duties. The contract Tori had with Gabby did not address assignment in any way. The contract Tori had with Harry, however, prohibited the right to assign payment for services received. Harry considered himself to be an experienced business person and insisted on that antiassignment clause because he had read somewhere that such a provision was a good idea. Tori finished the portrait of Harry and called him to come and pick it up. Meanwhile, a disgruntled secretary who disliked Tori told both Gabby and Harry about the assignments to Justin Gabby was furious and refused to pick up the portrait or to pay anyone. Harry likewise refused to pay for his portrait What would be the most likely result if Justin sues Gabby for the $10,000 payment? What would be the most likely result if Justin sues Gabby for the $10,000 payment? Multiple Choice O Gabby will win because the portrait was personal in nature and could not be delegated. o Justin will win only if Justin did a good job on the portraits. Justin will win unless Gabby can prove that Justin knew that she did not want him to do the portraits. Justin will lose unless Justin can prove that he was unaware that Gabby did not want him to do the portraits Justin will lose because Gabby's only obligation is to pay Tori. Required information (Business Law Rocks Business law instructor Courtney ordered 50 T-shirts for her classes that said "Business Law Rocks on the front. She wanted to distribute them on the last day of class and contracted with Tyler, who owned a T-shirt business, for the shirts to arrive by that day. The shirts arrived on Thursday, the day before the last class on Friday. Unfortunately, the shirts said "Business Law Yuck" on the front. Tyler told Courtney that he would remedy and fix the problem and that he had the right to do so. She told him, however, that she had to have the shirts the next day because the students would be gone after that. Courtney had also ordered some pamphlets on employment law to be used the next fall semester. The seller had agreed to provide the pamphlets 30 days before spring semester ended. The seller, however, erred and sent pamphlets on environmental law, which arrived 28 days before spring semester ended. The seller attempted to remedy the problem by sending the correct pamphlets on employment law, but they did not arrive until 27 days before spring semester ended. None of the parties had any prior dealings. Which statement is true in regard to the efforts of the seller of the employment law pamphlets to remedy the problem with the incorrect pam Multiple Choice O The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem, The seller could likely exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller would have had reasonable grounds to believe that Courtney would not have objected to the tender of the correct item at the time it was tendered O The seller could not act to remedy the problem because he did not have assurance from Courtney in writing that she would allow additional time in which to cure The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 10 days under the UCC to fix any problem. The seller could likely exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller would have had reasonable grounds to believe that Courtney would not have objected to the tender of the correct item at the time it was tendered. The seller could not act to remedy the problem because he did not have assurance from Courtney in writing that she would allow additional time in which to cure. The seller could not exercise the right to cure once the contract time for performance had ended because the seller did not provide prompt notice of his intent to cure and did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender of environmental pamphlets would be acceptable to Courtney. The seller correctly acted to remedy the problem because he had up to 20 days under the UCC to fix any problem Required information Portraits) Tori, a famous portrait painter, agreed to paint Harry's portrait for $4,000. She also agreed to paint the portraits of Gabby's two Corgi dogs, Queenie and Prince Gabby agreed to pay Tori $10,000 for the two Corgi portraits. Tori charged Gabby more because she met the spoiled dogs, and they really got on her nerves. Tori subsequently fell behind on finishing Harry's portrait, so she assigned the right to receive the money for the dog portraits to her assistant, Justin, and delegated the duty to Justin to paint the dog portraits. Justin eagerly accepted, and painted the portraits. Tori also assigned to Justin the right to receive payment from Harry to satisfy various payments she owed him for other duties. The contract Tori had with Gabby did not address assignment in any way. The contract Tori had with Harry, however, prohibited the right to assign payment for services received. Harry considered himself to be an experienced business person and insisted on that antiassignment clause because he had read somewhere that such a provision was a good idea. Tori finished the portrait of Harry and called him to come and pick it up. Meanwhile, a disgruntled secretary who disliked Tori told both Gabby and Harry about the assignments to Justin Gabby was furious and refused to pick up the portrait or to pay anyone. Harry likewise refused to pay for his portrait What would be the most likely result if Justin sues Gabby for the $10,000 payment? What would be the most likely result if Justin sues Gabby for the $10,000 payment? Multiple Choice O Gabby will win because the portrait was personal in nature and could not be delegated. o Justin will win only if Justin did a good job on the portraits. Justin will win unless Gabby can prove that Justin knew that she did not want him to do the portraits. Justin will lose unless Justin can prove that he was unaware that Gabby did not want him to do the portraits Justin will lose because Gabby's only obligation is to pay Tori