Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Required information Market Share Liability The legal doctrine of market share liability protects plaintiffs who do not realize they were harmed by products until years

image text in transcribed
Required information Market Share Liability The legal doctrine of market share liability protects plaintiffs who do not realize they were harmed by products until years after they used the product Often plaintiffs may have used many different brands of the same product or might not know who manufactured the product. The legal theory of market share liability allows plaintiffs to gain recovery for their injuries despite these difficulties Before beginning this exercise, review the section titled "Market Share Liability in Chapter 10 of your text, paying special attention to the case of Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories. Apply what you have learned to the lead-paint case discussed as follows Read the case below and answer the questions A family with a small child moves often. The family has lived in two different apartment complexes in the past six months. While living in the apartments, the child, Hilary, unknowingly ingests white lead paint chips and lead paint dust from the walls and ceiling. As a result, Hilary is diagnosed with lead poisoning. Consequently, she suffered cognitive injuries related to high lead blood samples The apartments were all built around 1920. In the state where Hilary and her family lived, lead paint became illegal for Interior surfaces in 1976. So there is a 56-year period when the lead paint could have legally been put on the walls of the apartments. The apartments could have been repainted numerous times, and there is no way to determine which specific lead paint companies the paint came from. In fact, it is possible that multiple companies' paint affected Hilary. Hilary's family was successful in suing the landlord and insurer of the apartments. In addition, the child's family brought tigation against the manufacturers of lead paint. Even though the paint was not legal, the plaintiffs present evidence that the lead paint industry knew about the potential dangers and did not stop using the product. If the judge rules in favor of Hilary's family in a market share liability case), who potentially would need to pay for the damages? Why? This question will be sent to your instructor for grading 2 of 5 O search o a REDESIGNED. RELIABLE READY FOR YOU

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Essentials Of Health Care Finance

Authors: William O. Cleverley, James O. Cleverley

8th Edition

1284094634, 978-1284094633

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions