Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Required information Skip to question Evaluating Charts for a Presentation You should generally evaluate your charts in terms of the following: title descriptiveness, focal points,

Required information
Skip to question
Evaluating Charts for a Presentation
You should generally evaluate your charts in terms of the following: title descriptiveness, focal points, information sufficiency, ease of processing, and take-away message.
Title descriptiveness. Most readers look first at the charts title to grasp its message. Thus, the title should explain the primary point of the chart. However, it must be short enough for the reader to process quickly (generally fewer than ten words).
Focal points. A chart should draw the readers attention to the most critical relationships and ideas. Each of the charts focal points should support one main idea. The focal points can be visually generated in many interesting ways, including font choices (bold, italics), color, size, and callout boxes.
Information sufficiency. Charts should contain enough information for the reader to quickly and reasonably understand the ideas that are being displayed. Clear labels and legends should demonstrate what is being measured and in what units. In some cases, readers will expect to know data values at each point within the chart.
Ease of processing. A basic purpose of a chart is to convey complicated information as quickly as possible. By selecting only the necessary information and placing labels and data at appropriate places, you enable your reader to process the information quickly and efficiently. Ideally, your reader should grasp the key ideas within 10 to 15 seconds.
Take-away message. An effective chart leaves a lasting impression about your key point. The take-away is the essence of your charthow the information, title, focal points, and other formatting combine to convey a lasting message.
Read the case below and answer the questions that follow.
You are a marketing specialist at a media company. Over the past few years, you have been researching how TV viewers use mobile phones and other devices while watching TV. You have found that, increasingly, viewers expect to engage via mobile devices with TV shows and their audiences while watching TV.
Recently, you finished a survey that you have conducted annually for the past three years. Each year, you randomly sampled adults over 18 across the country. The number of participants in the surveys was 1,543 adults in 2012,2,337 in 2013, and 2,342 in 2014. You compiled the following statistics from the survey:
During the last month, which of the following actions have you taken with your cell phone while watching TV?201220132014
Browsed the Internet during commercials 21%28%47%
Browsed the Internet during shows 13%15%29%
Checked the accuracy of info on TV 25%27%26%
Posted comments online about the show 5%17%33%
Viewed comments online from other viewers 8%23%38%
Texted other viewers 14%16%24%
Visited a website mentioned on TV 15%13%20%
Voted for a reality show contestant 7%6%5%
Entered a contest mentioned on TV 1%2%1%
Tweeted about the show 1%3%14%
You and your colleagues will soon give a presentation to executives at your company. You want to focus on how to engage TV viewers with their mobile devices. During the presentation, you will present some of the findings of this survey, and you want to support the view that TV viewers increasingly expect an interactive, engaging experience that involves using their mobile phones.
You and your colleagues have created the following charts (each of which has strengths and weaknesses):
Line Chart 1
A line chart titled, the rise of connected TV viewers; viewers browse, read, and post during their TV experiences.The horizontal axis labeled year ranges from 2012 through 2014, in increments of 1. The vertical axis represents percent ranging from 0 through 50 in increments of 10. The chart plots four increasing curves, with the approximate data as follows: Browsed the internet during shows, 13 percent in 2012,15 percent in 2013, and 28 percent in 2014. Posted comments online about the show, 5 percent in 2012,17 percent in 2013, and 34 percent in 2014. Viewed comments online from other viewers, 8 percent in 2012,24 percent in 2013, and 38 percent in 2014. Browsed the internet during commercials, 21 percent in 2012,28 percent in 2013, and 48 percent in 2014.
McGraw-Hill Education
Line Chart 2
A line chart titled, changes in connected viewing, 2012 through 2014 plots 4 increasing curves.The horizontal axis labeled year ranges from 2012 through 2014, in increments of 1. The vertical axis represents percent ranging from 0 through 50 in increments of 5. The data are as follows: Browsed internet during shows, 21 percent in 2012,28 percent in 2013, and 47 percent in 2014. Posted comments online, 8 percent in 2012,23 percent in 2013, and 38 percent in 2014. Viewed comments online, 5 percent in 2012,17 percent in 2013, and 33 percent in 2014. Browsed internet during commer

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Successful Time Management

Authors: Patrick Forsyth

1st Edition

0749486198, 978-0749486198

More Books

Students also viewed these General Management questions