Requirements to be addressed in the mercury spill near Newmont's Peruvian gold mine memo: The internal audit team tested whether management and employee actions aligned with the corporate social responsibility statements made to the public during the case at hand. What does your audit team use as evidence for evaluating this? Provide at least two, if not three, concrete examples from the case information and explain why the evidence is reliable and persuasive. (This is a great introduction into Auditing Culture.) Note: This part of your memo you are looking backwards at a previous case that has happened and evaluating what happened. Research how Newmont is currently addressing corporate social responsibility compared to the timeframe represented in the case. Are there any Governance policies, Ethics, Codes of Conduct, Safety policies/programs, etc.? What did you find on any recent cases with the company? Note: This part of your memo you are looking at present material and thinking forward to if what currently exists will protect the company from future cases like the one you read. Based on the (past case) facts presented and any (present and future) research youve done, formulate two recommendations to senior management for improving their Governance/Ethics/Corporate Social Responsibility program. This should be compelling, substantive, fact-based and practical.