Research a Canadian-based construction claim case or situation. For your argument, please address EACH of the questions below:

1. What are the factsbearing on the case? The term fact applies to the events, or alleged events, that have led to a claim or lawsuit. The facts are important because they are the basis for your argument.
2. What is (or are) the issue(s) being discussed by the argument? The issue is whatever the parties are arguing about. The issue might be something like "Is the contractor entitled to payment?"; "Did the contractor breach the contract?"; etc.
3. What are the premisesof the argument? The most common type of premise in a legal argument is a law or some type of rule. Or could be the contract, an example being "a party must honor its contract."
4. What is the argument trying to convince you to believe? In other words, what is the conclusion of the argument

Please put your paper in the following format:

• Abstract (explaining botharguments, only one Abstract needed)
• Overview of case (please mention company names)
• Construction arguments w/ two references
  • Facts
  • Issue(s)
  • Premise
  • Conclusion
• Non-construction arguments w/ two references
  • Facts
  • Issue(s)
  • Premise
  • Conclusion
• References