Research into the soft drink market indicates that the two firms compete by selecting quantities (Cournot competition). Soft drinks are regarded as a homogeneous good by consumers, and inverse demand in the market is estimated to be,

P=3.6 Q /100,000

where P represents the price of a bottle of soft drink, and Q is the total number of bottles sold per year.

At present soft drinks sell for $2.95 a bottle. Bubbles PLC produces 40,000 bottles per year, paying $16,000 in bottle tax. CarbonCorp produces 25,000 bottles and pays $10,000. It is estimated that it costs Bubbles PLC $2.15 per bottle of soft drink produced, while producing a bottle of soft drink cost CarbonCorp $2.30. The fixed costs of production can be neglected in this analysis. Step 1: Using the information provided in the scenario, derive a total cost function foreach soft drink producer for the case in which the government levies a tax of $1.00 perbottle. Use QBto denote the quantity produced by Bubbles PLC, and QCto denote thequantity produced by CarbonCorp. Note that a firm's marginal cost will be the sum of itscost of producing a bottle, and the tax that it must pay to the government on each bottlesold. (5 marks) Step 2: Using the cost functions from step 1, derive a profit function for each firm. (10 marks)

Step 3: Derive each firm's best-response function. (15 marks) Step 4: Solve the best-response functions simultaneously to find the equilibrium quantities for each firm. (10 marks) Step 5: Find the equilibrium price and tax revenue. (10 marks)

Step 4: Solve the best-response functions simultaneously to find the equilibrium quantities for each firm. (10 marks) Step 5: Find the equilibrium price and tax revenue. (10 marks) The island nation of Autarka is growing concerned over the amount of rubbish accumulating in the waters off its coastline. This pollution is harming marine life, damaging fish stocks, and washing up on tourist beaches. Research by the National University of Autarka has determined that a significant component of the solid waste is the single-use plastic bottles used by soft-drink manufacturers. Currently, soft drink manufacturers in Autarka pay a tax of $0.40 on each bottle of drink they sell. The revenue from the tax is used to fund the cleaning of roads and public spaces. The scientific community is lobbying the government to increase the tax to $1.00 a bottle. The scientists suggest that any additional revenue could be used to fund programs to remove rubbish from the coastal waters. There are two producers of soft drinks in Autarka: Bubbles PLC and CarbonCorp. The two companies have made submissions to the government opposing the proposed tax increase, which they claim will harm consumers.