Research two famous fraud cases involving Ponzi schemes; one for Charles Ponzi from the 1920s and the other for Tom Petters. You are going to take on the role of fraud examiner in both of these cases. You will use your research to create one Fraud Examination Report for both cases.

• As part of theScope identify and provide specific examples of the criminal and/or civil action that were taken in each of these cases. Do you think there were additional actions that were not taken that should have been taken in either or both cases?
• As part of theApproach discuss the events you would have implemented in these cases leading up to the interview, list 2 questions each you would ask during the initial interview itself to both Charles Ponze and Tom Petters, and what you would have planned for the next interview in both of these cases to ensure a conviction.
• As part of theApproach also discuss the standards of evidence needed in each of these cases to obtain a conviction based on your approach leading up to the interview. Specifically identify how you would obtain the informaiton needed.
• As part of the Findings discuss any similarities between these 2 cases as they relate specifically to securities fraud. In this section create charts, graphs, or other visual material as if you were presenting this data in court.