Researchers suspect that myopia, or nearsightedness, is becoming more common over time. A study from the year 2000 showed 134 cases of myopia in 405 randomly selected people. A separate study from 2015 showed 229 cases in 620 randomly selected people. Let the people in 2000 represent population 1 and the people in 2015 represent population. If the conclusion is "reject the null hypothesis", what is the correct interpretation of the conclusion?

We conclude that the percentage of people who had myopia in 2000 is greater than percentage of people who had myopia in 2015.

We conclude that the percentage of people who had myopia in 2000 is equal to the percentage of people who had myopia in 2015.

There is not sufficient evidence to support that myopia is becoming more common over time.

There is sufficient evidence to support that myopia is becoming more common over time.