respond in a 50 word count agreeing of disagreeing in their thought !!! (Help)

When it comes to believing that organizational membership in a regulated activity is being sufficient to make a person subject to rules I would say no it is not enough. Just like in everything in life rules and regulations will be broken. Having regulations helps by addressing issues and informing that there are consequences for wrongdoing. Having a system in place that ensures and supports the appropriate ideas. Regardless, it is important to maintain other options and have backup plans when these membership rules do not work. Using outer sources is important to ensure everything is in order. Sometimes decisions or cases are above the average regulations and need authorities involved. ADRs have many benefits in some cases they are even recommended by lawyers ADRs offer a quicker, more adorable, and private option to resolve disputes/issues. The effectiveness of and resolution is very important especially when dealing with a living animal. One of the biggest disadvantages that come up is the risk of statements made during negotiations being used as an admission of fault/responsibility in the event of further litigation. In some states, even an apology can qualify as an admission of fault. Depending on the case the benefits outweigh the risks it is just very important to be careful about what is said during the process and conscious of how it can be used