Question
Respond the the below: I truly enjoyed learning about the government contract acquisition process during this course. I've gained enough knowledge to feel confident going
Respond the the below:
I truly enjoyed learning about the government contract acquisition process during this course. I've gained enough knowledge to feel confident going into the next level of courses in the program. Revising FAR 9.4 to streamline small-dollar fraud cases in government contracting offers both advantages and disadvantages.
Advantages:
Efficiency: Streamlining the process could lead to quicker resolution of cases. According to a study by Callahan and Koosed (2017), faster resolution of legal cases can significantly reduce costs and improve overall efficiency. For example, if a small-dollar fraud case takes years to resolve under the current system, streamlining could reduce this timeframe to months, saving resources for both the government and contractors involved.
Cost-effectiveness: Simplifying procedures may reduce the costs associated with investigating and litigating small-dollar fraud cases. Research by Gopalakrishnan and Damanpour (2017) suggests that cost savings in legal proceedings can be substantial. For instance, the expenses related to extensive documentation, expert witness fees, and court appearances could be minimized through streamlined processes.
Disadvantages:
Due Process Concerns: Streamlining may compromise due process rights, potentially leading to unfair treatment of defendants. As noted by Greenawalt (2018), due process is a fundamental aspect of the legal system, ensuring that individuals are treated fairly under the law. For example, if expedited procedures limit the defendant's ability to present evidence or cross-examine witnesses, it could result in unjust outcomes.
Risk of Oversight: Simplified procedures may increase the risk of oversight or errors in judgment. Research by Kagan (2019) highlights the importance of thorough review and oversight in legal proceedings to prevent miscarriages of justice. For instance, if streamlined processes result in inadequate investigation or oversight, innocent parties may be wrongly accused or convicted.
I believe streamlining FAR 9.4 for small-dollar fraud cases offers potential benefits such as efficiency and cost-effectiveness, it also raises concerns regarding due process and oversight. Finding the right balance between expediency and fairness is essential to ensure that the revised procedures uphold the principles of justice in government contracting.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started