1. RESPOND: to the following questions:
2.  Do you agree with the majority decision or the dissenting in Pincay?  Provide a rationale for your answer.
3. Do you agree with the decision in Henderson?  Provide a rationale for your answer.
4. Provide an active link to the article you located.  Which idea presented in the article do you think would have been most useful to the attorneys in Pincay and Henderson?  Why?

READ: the 9th Circuit case Pincay v. Andrews, 351 F.3d 947 (2003).  

Also read the article: Lawyer Mistakes and Remedial Action.pdf regarding the case Henderson v. Pacific Gas, 187 Cal.App.4th 215, 113 Cal.Rptr.3d 692 (2010)

 

REFLECT: on the mistakes made in each case and why they happened.

RESEARCH: and locate an article on proper supervision of non-attorney staff.  Be sure that the article you choose can be accessed by other students without having to sign up for an account to that website.  If necessary, you can copy the article as a PDF and attach it.  Do not cite an article that another student has already used.

 

1.