Respond to the post below chose the perspectives you did not choose (e.g., if you chose culture, respond to one colleague who chose immigration and one who chose geography). I've choose immigration

• Discuss how your perspective aligns with or differs from your colleague's related to perceived need and implementation.

Policy or program that would be relevant to this case study.

Victims of trafficking and violence prevention act.

Perspective you chose

I chose to view this case study within the scope of immigration.

Need for Policy

Immigrants specifically those that are undocumented/ here on expired visas are suspectable to violence and Trafficking, due to the fact they have the most to lose and extreme fear of law enforcement due to deportation. Abusers know this and take advantage of it. (ACLU, 2008)

General policy impact

Generally looking at this policy it is a policy that will allow for a path to citizenship via a first step at a U vista for those who have been a victim of trafficking or violence and are willing to work with authorities to help put an end to the violence. In some cases, this path can be applied to children of victims as well. While this is just a visa will allow those with it to apply for a green card and then citizenship. (Leimer, 2023)

Case study policy impact

In this case, because Luisa was a victim of Domestic Violence if she is willing to work with Authorities she can apply for this visa and as the primary on it, she is able to apply to have it cover her minor children as well. This will give them 4 years, with extensions possible, to work a good paying job here in the US and get Green Cards for her older 2 children and Citizenship down the road from there.