Review Case 8-9 Eat at my Restaurant - Profitability View" on p. 362 from Ch. 8 of Financial Reporting & Analysis. Answer the following Required problems. When commenting on each ratio, provide evidence to support your rationale. Include an illustration, figure, or table. Look at the Figure Example document for how these illustrations may appear. a b CASE 8-10 EAT AT MY RESTAURANT PROFITABILITY VIEW COMPREHENSIVE INCOME INCLUDED With this case, we review the profitability of Yum Brands, Panera Bread and Starbucks, including comprehensive income for 2010 and 2009. Ratio Yum Brands, Inc. Panera Bread Starbucks 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Net profit margin % 10.18 11.67 7.26 6.40 8.75 4.17 Return on assets % 14.94 18.50 12.71 11.47 15.67 7.25 Return on total equity % 83.00 248.04 18.72 16.98 27.90 14.73 Required a. Which company appears to have the better net profit margin? b. Which company appears to have the best return on assets? Source: Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries 2010 10-K Source: Panera Bread 2010 10-K Source: Starbucks Corporation 2010 10-K c. Which company appears to have the better return on total equity? d. 1. Considering the data in Case 8-9 and Case 8-10, comment on the impact of considering comprehensive income for each company for the years 2010 and 2009: Yum Brands Panera Bread Starbucks 2. Would the impact be the same in future years