Review each case in the list and take a quote from each case that presents the Court's explanation of Summary Judgment and write the Statement of Law (Rule of Law) section for a Motion for Summary Judgment by putting information from each case together in a narrative form. This is not bullet points. You must take at least one (1) quote, but not more than two (2) quotes, from each case and use proper and correct citation form, including abbreviated citation form when appropriate. You must use every case. Some of the summary judgment material in each case will be more obvious that in others, but there is something you can use in each case, even if it is only a phrase. If you Google search each case by name you will find links to the case opinion. You do not need to be concerned with the individual facts or holdings of these cases, nor should you use any part of the case that does not generally deal with Summary Judgment. Everything you need for this assignment is contained in the list of cases. Your task for this

assignment is to research "within" the cases---and craft a general explanation of the legal standard that must be met for the Court to issue an Order granting Summary Judgment, which could be used for any Motion for Summary Judgment, regardless of the specific facts of a case. It will basically be a very brief (one sentence) introductory explanation of what Summary Judgment is and when it is appropriate, followed by a collection of quotes, sentences or phrases, or paraphrasing the criteria taken from the cases. It is not a "list"it needs to flow in narrative fashion in the paragraph(s), so you need to use transitional language to connect the information you take from each case. The entire assignment should not exceed one (1) page . The heading for the assignment should look like this: STATEMENT OF LAW A. Standard for Summary Judgment LIST OF CASES for you to use: Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.242, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (1986). Adaven Mgmt., Inc. v. Mountain Falls Acquisition Corp., 124 Nev. 770, 774, 191 P.3d 1189, 1192 (2008) Aldabe V. Adams, 81 Nev. 280, 402 P.2d 34 (1965). (overruled on other grounds by Siragusa v. Brown, 114 Nev. 1394, 971 P.2d 802 1998)). Bond v. Stardust, Inc., 82 Nev. 47, 410 P.2d 472 (1966). Posadas v. City of Reno, 109 Nev. 448, 452, 851 P.2d 438, 441-42 (1993). Short v. Hotel Riviera, Inc., 79 Nev. 94, 378 P.2d 979 (1963).

I included the cases and text I honestly just have no idea where to even start. I looked at the first case and pulled this quote, "(a) Summary judgment will not lie if the dispute about a material fact is "genuine," that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party. At the summary judgment stage, the trial judge's function is not himself to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter, but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial. There is no such issue unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party. In essence, the inquiry is whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury, or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law. Pp. 477 U. S. 247-252." For a summary judgment, with these instructions, should I just use the quote, add the citation, and just give a brief explanation of the quote?