Review Jacob Hartz Seed Co. v. Coleman, the dissent refers to testing of the allegedly nonconforming beans and notes that the beans did not "come back to life" The distinction between the majority opinion and the dissent appears to depend on the standard of review. Can you find the language in the majority opinion and the dissent concerning the amount of deference the appellate court should afford the trial court's finding of fact? Do you think the majority reached the correct decision?