1. Review the case from the end of Chapter 8 (p. 104 in the "Real Law" section) in your textbook:
   • "Chad Parker owned an acre of property and a mobile home on that property. He sold the mobile home to David and Allison Wilson for $1,000 and sold the property to them for $10,000. These agreements were made orally. No title or deed transfers took place. The Wilsons lived in the mobile home for seven years, making $11,228.19 of improvements to the structure and to the property. After a falling out between Chad and David, Chad had the Wilsons evicted and moved back into the mobile home."
2. Would a court agree that Chad has the right to legally evict the Wilsons and move back into the mobile home because there was no written contract between the parties?
   1. In the first paragraph of your post, explain why a court would agree with Chad and allow the Wilsons to be evicted, since there was no written agreement between them.
   2. In the second paragraph of your post, explain why a court would not agree that Chad has the right to evict the Wilsons, even though there was not a written agreement between them.
   3. In your third paragraph, state who you believe should win this case and why.
3. For your peer responses, extend your exploration of the issues involved in the case and its conclusion.
   • At least one of your peer responses should address the court's decision.
   • You can offer an extension or elaboration on your peer's initial posting and/or the case decision, or you can present an alternate point of view that demonstrates a new perspective about the case.