Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Review the cases belowand answer the questions: Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005) The appeals court held that continued
Review the cases belowand answer the questions:
- Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005)
The appeals court held that continued employment was evidence of acceptance of the offer and employment was consideration. Because the employees were already working. Why was there consideration? Was there a change in anything?
If the case had come out the opposite. How could an employer change the terms of the working arrangement (contract)?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started