Review the facts of the Andrea Yates case found in Review Problem [B] on pages 438- 439 of the casebook, and answer the following questions: 1. If Yates asserted a defense of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (insanity) in a jurisdiction applying the M'Naghten test for insanity, would her defense succeed? 2. If Yates asserted a defense of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (insanity) in a jurisdiction applying the Durham test for insanity, would her defense succeed? 3. If Yates asserted a defense of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (insanity) in a jurisdiction applying the irresistible impulse test for insanity, would her defense succeed? 4. If Yates asserted a defense of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (insanity) in a jurisdiction applying the Model Penal Code test for insanity, would her defense succeed? Please respond to the above prompts ONLY; do not respond to the questions posed in the casebook. Be sure to apply the legal rules identified in the calls of the question, which differ from the rule identified in the facts on page 439 of the casebook.