Question
Review the income statements on the Absorption Statement and Variable Statement panels, then complete the following table. The companys sales price per unit is $75.00,
Review the income statements on the Absorption Statement and Variable Statement panels, then complete the following table. The companys sales price per unit is $75.00, and the number of units in ending inventory is 5,000.
Item | Amount |
Number of units sold | |
Variable sales and administrative cost per unit | |
Number of units manufactured | |
Variable cost of goods manufactured per unit | |
Fixed manufacturing cost per unit |
Absorption Statement
Absorption costing does not distinguish between variable and fixed costs. All manufacturing costs are included in the cost of goods sold.
Saxon, Inc. |
Absorption Costing Income Statement |
For the Year Ended December 31 |
1 | Sales |
| $1,125,000.00 |
2 | Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
3 | Beginning inventory | $0.00 |
|
4 | Cost of goods manufactured | 840,000.00 |
|
5 | Ending inventory | (210,000.00) |
|
6 | Total cost of goods sold |
| 630,000.00 |
7 | Gross profit |
| $495,000.00 |
8 | Selling and administrative expenses |
| 275,000.00 |
9 | Income from operations |
| $220,000.00 |
Variable Statement
Under variable costing, the cost of goods manufactured includes only variable manufacturing costs. This type of income statement includes a computation of manufacturing margin.
Saxon, Inc. |
Variable Costing Income Statement |
For the Year Ended December 31 |
1 | Sales |
| $1,125,000.00 |
2 | Variable cost of goods sold: |
|
|
3 | Beginning inventory | $0.00 |
|
4 | Variable cost of goods manufactured | 600,000.00 |
|
5 | Ending inventory | (150,000.00) |
|
6 | Total variable cost of goods sold |
| 450,000.00 |
7 | Manufacturing margin |
| $675,000.00 |
8 | Variable selling and administrative expenses |
| 210,000.00 |
9 | Contribution margin |
| $465,000.00 |
10 | Fixed costs: |
|
|
11 | Fixed manufacturing costs | $240,000.00 |
|
12 | Fixed selling and administrative expenses | 65,000.00 |
|
13 | Total fixed costs |
| 305,000.00 |
14 | Income from operations |
| $160,000.00 |
Manufacturing Decisions
Whenever the units manufactured differ from the units sold, finished goods inventory is affected. In analyzing income from operations, such increases and decreases could be misinterpreted as operating efficiencies or inefficiencies. Each decision-making situation should be carefully analyzed in deciding whether absorption or variable costing reporting would be more useful.
All costs are controllable in the long run by someone within a business. For a given level of management, costs may be controllable costs or noncontrollable costs.
The production manager for Saxon, Inc. is worried because the company is not showing a high enough profit. Looking at the income statements on the Absorption Statement panel and the Variable Statement panel, he notices that the income from operations is higher on the absorption cost income statement. He is considering manufacturing another 10,000 units, up to the companys capacity for manufacturing, in the coming year. He reasons that this will boost income from operations and satisfy the companys owner that the company is sufficiently profitable. Although the total units manufactured changes, assume that total fixed costs, unit variable costs, unit sales price, and the sales levels are the same. Complete questions (1)-(4) that follow. If the answer is zero, enter "0".
1. Use the income statements on the Absorption Statement and Variable Statement panels to complete the following table for the original production level. Then prepare similar income statements at a production level 10,000 units higher and add that information to the table. Assume that total fixed costs, unit variable costs, unit sales price, and the sales levels are the same at both production levels.
Income From Operations | |||
Original | Original | Additional | Additional |
Production | Production | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Level-Absorption | Level-Variable | Units-Absorption | Units-Variable |
2. What is the change in income from operations from producing 10,000 additional units under absorption costing?
3. What is the change in income from operations from producing 10,000 additional units under variable costing?
4. What would be your recommendation to the production manager?
Do not produce the extra 10,000 units. Income from operations does not change under absorption costing when the additional units are produced.
Produce the extra 10,000 units. It's always a good idea to have extra units on hand and keep the factory operating at capacity, even if all the units are not sold.
Produce the extra 10,000 units. Income from operations will be increased, and the production manager will receive praise for creating higher profits.
Do not produce the extra 10,000 units. The increase in income from operations under absorption costing is due to fixed manufacturing costs being held in inventory, and the additional inventory will lead to higher handling, storage, financing, and obsolescence costs.
Contribution Margin Data
For planning and control purposes, managers often compare planned and actual contribution margin. Variable costing is used as a basis for such analyses.
Examine the following contribution margin data, and then complete the Contribution Margin Analysis panel.
Saxon, Inc. | ||
Contribution Margin Data Schedule | ||
Actual | Planned | |
Sales | $1,125,000 | $1,190,000 |
Variable cost of goods sold | $450,000 | $462,000 |
Variable selling and administrative expenses | 210,000 | 154,000 |
Total | $660,000 | $616,000 |
Contribution margin | $465,000 | $574,000 |
Number of units sold | 15,000 | 14,000 |
Per unit: | ||
Sales price | $75.00 | $85.00 |
Variable cost of goods sold | 30.00 | 33.00 |
Variable selling and administrative expenses | 14.00 | 11.00 |
Contribution Margin Analysis
Contribution margin analysis focuses on explaining the differences between planned and actual contribution margins, considering the quantity factor and the unit price factor.
After reviewing the data on the Contribution Margin Data panel, complete the following contribution margin analysis. For those boxes in which you must enter subtracted or negative numbers use a minus sign.
Saxon, Inc. |
Contribution Margin Analysis |
For the Year Ended December 31 |
1 | Planned contribution margin |
|
|
2 | Effect of changes in sales: |
|
|
3 | Sales quantity factor |
|
|
4 | Unit price factor |
|
|
5 | Total effect of changes in sales |
|
|
6 | Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold: |
|
|
7 | Variable cost quantity factor |
|
|
8 | Unit cost factor |
|
|
9 | Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold |
|
|
10 | Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses: |
|
|
11 | Variable cost quantity factor |
|
|
12 | Unit cost factor |
|
|
13 | Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
14 | Actual contribution margin |
|
|
Final Questions
After reviewing your work on the Contribution Margin Analysis panel, answer the following three questions.
1. Explain the total effect of changes in sales on the contribution margin.
A. Lowering the sales price caused sales to be lower, decreasing overall contribution margin.
B. Actual total units sold was lower than planned, causing a decrease in contribution margin.
C. The reduction in sales price lowered contribution margin, but the increased quantity of sales more than made up for it.
D. The reduction in sales price caused higher sales, but contribution margin was nevertheless negative overall.
2. Explain the total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold.
A. More units were sold and so the variable cost of goods sold was higher, even though the per unit variable cost of goods sold was less than planned.
B. Variable cost of goods sold negatively affected contribution margin because of an increase in per unit costs.
C. Overall, the effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold increased contribution margin.
D. The reduction in per unit variable cost of goods sold negatively affected contribution margin, but the increased sales overcame this effect.
3. Explain the total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses.
A. Because the per unit variable selling and administrative expenses increased, contribution margin was greater.
B. Contribution margin went up because of a decrease in selling and administrative expenses.
C. Due to increased sales there was an increased contribution margin due to increased selling and administrative expenses.
D. The per unit variable selling and administrative expense was higher than planned, and more units were sold, yielding a negative effect on contribution margin.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started