Review the six requirements for strict product liability listed. Apply the facts of Hot Coffee - McDonalds case of 1994 case to those six requirements. Explain whether the plaintiff in this case did or did not meet each of the requirements for strict product liability.

1. The product must be in a defective condition when the defendant sells it
2. The defendant must normally be engaged in the business of selling/distributing the product
3. The product must be unreasonablydangerous to the user or consumer because of its defective condition
4. The plaintiff must incur physical harm to self or property by use of consumption of the product.
5. The defendant condition must be the proximate cause of the injury or damage.
6. The goods must not have been substantially changed from the time the product was sold to the time the injury was sustained.