Review the truth table shared by a classmate. Extend the discussion by taking truth values from their final column (for their complex statement) and reflecting on how this use of logic can be useful in the context of system inputs/outputs by addressing the following:

1. If the truth values of the complex statement were translated to binary outputs, setting T = 1 and F = 0, what would be the binary string equivalent to their true values?
2. Consider how logic can be useful in planning the design of a system, such as this smart home control, by reviewing the three simple statements evaluated by your classmate and how they are represented in the final complex statement. Addressing the following questions, comment on if it appears this gating established by the complex statement would prompt the system to carry out the intended action appropriately or not.

• If the output from evaluating this complex statement is 1, then the action would be executed by the system. Does this make sense for each row, or sequence of simple, input statements? Why or why not?
• If the output from evaluating this complex statement is 0, then the action wouldnotbe executed by the system. Does this make sense for each row or sequence of simple input statements? Why or why not?

ATTACHED IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT A FINISHED PRODUCT WOULD LIKE AND THE STUDENT I NEED IT DONE FOR AS WELL; THE STUDENT IS ON TOP AND THE EXAMPLE IS UNDER THAT; THANK YOU!

Hello everyone, My new smart home is going to help me preheat the oven at 5PM only ifl am home. The three statements that will be evaluated by my system are as follows: p: The security system is armed q: The time is 5PM r: The oven is on If the security system is not an'ned and the time is 5pm then the oven is on (~pAqu Unit 1 Discussion Example Post 2: Reply to a Classmate Here are my classmates statements: 1i Smart home system action : Turn on the front porch lights. p = It is dark outside. q = No-one is home. r = The front door is open. 2i The truth table translated Into an lnputfoutput table ls: INPUT OUTPUT If the final truth value of n1.- oomplete statement ls truer then I want the front porch lights to go on. Let's see if logic is appropriate to turn on the lights: Ti 1 = It is dark outside. noone is home. the front door is open. 'r'E5. TURN ON THE LIGHTS! T .I" 1 : It Is dark outside, noone ls home, the front door Is not open. YES, STILLTIJRN ON THE LIGHTS! T .I' 1 = It Is dark outside, someone ls home, the front door ls open. YES. STILL TURN ON THE LIGHTS! F HI = It is dark outside, someone is home, the Front door is not open. DON'T TURN ON THE LIGHTS F HI : It Is not dark outside, noone is home, the front door is open. DON'T TURN ON THE LIGHTS F Hi = It is not dark outside. noone is home. the front door is not open. DON'T TURN ON THE LIGHTS F {D = It Is not dark outside, someone is home, the front door ls open. DDN'T TURN ON THE LIGHTS F HI = It is not dark outside. someone is home. the front door is not open. DON'T TURN ON THE LIGHTS Yes. I would agree that the logic would be appropriate to turn on the front porch lights. It really needs to be dark out before I can even consider turning on the lights. lonl'r want the lights to oorne one when either it is dark out and someone is going outside or to allow someone outside to come inl