Revise the following passages to minimize prepositions:

Henry II had genius of a high order, which never manifested itself more clearly than in his appreciation of the inevitability of the divergence of the paths of crime and of tort, and in his conception of crimes as offenses against the whole community.

The recognition of the propriety of a court's overruling its own decisions places those decisions on the plane of merely persuasive authority and causes our theory of judicial precedent to be substantially like the theory held on the continent of Europe.

Penfold had no knowledge of the amount of money paidand could not have had knowledge of thisin advance of Penfold's review of its financial position in 2010. Thus, Penfold's profit-sharing is neither deserving of nor subject to the protections of Title III.

In the case ofR.E. Spriggs Co. v. Adolph Coors Co.,94 Cal. App. 3d 419 (Ct. App. 1979), the Court of Appeal of California addressed the estoppel effect of a cease-and-desist order. The court was of the view that the trial court erred in failing to apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel, since the factual issue in dispute had been litigated and decided in an earlier case involving the enforcement of an FTC cease-and-desist order.

One or both of the aspects of the function of the court must suffer. Either consideration of the merits of the actual controversy must yield to the need of detailed formulation of a precedent that will not embarrass future decision, or careful formulation must give way to the demand for study of the merits of the case at hand.