Rhonda was receiving harassing phone calls and so she attached an electronic recording device to her telephone in an attempt to catch the caller. She recorded every call she received and then took the information to the police, who used the recorded material to charge her neighbour, Jorge. 1. Jorge wants to argue that Rhonda illegally intercepted his telephone calls and taped them without his consent. Is he correct? 2. Would your answer to the question about Rhonda and Jorge be different if, before putting the recording device on her phone, Rhonda had contacted the police, who asked her to come in to pick up such a device from them and instructed her on how to attach it to her phone and operate it? 3. Would your answer be different if instead of contacting the police Rhonda called the telephone company, which put a recording device on her phone with the intention of catching Jorge and turning the information over to the police