Richard and Michelle Kommit traveled to New Jersey to have fun in the

casinos. While in Atlantic City, they used their MasterCard to withdraw cash

from an ATM conveniently located in the "pit," which is the gambling area of

a casino. They ran up debts of $5,500 on the credit card and did not pay. The

Connecticut National Bank sued for the money. What argument should the

Kommits make? Which party, if any, has the moral high ground here? Should a

casino offer ATM services in the gambling pit? If a credit card company

allows customers to withdraw cash in a casino, is it encouraging them to lose

money? Do the Kommits have any ethical right to use the ATM, attempt to win

money by gambling, and then seek to avoid liability