Richman files a lawsuit in federal district court against Happy Town, alleging that the town ordinance violates her equal protection rights under the Firstand FourteenthAmendments.The district court judge dismissed the case out via summary judgment, finding that the ordinance is facially valid and that Richman failed to present any evidence to support her allegations. She filed a second claim that alleged the same facts as what was presented in the original complaint, but she added new information: she named a specific defendant, Public Works Commissioner Winn.Richman alleged that Winn used Winn's position to coerce two of Richman's neighbors to complain about her.Richman also alleged that Winn used Winn's position to induce a member of the community to write a disparaging editorial in the local newspaper about her. Richman also alleged that the Town defamed her character and discriminated against her based on her ethnicity.

Is this second claim barred by the Doctrine of Res Judicata?