Robin, a middle management employee in Human Resources at a large, publicly traded company, becomes aware of sexual harassment by Brooke, a top sales manager at the company. The female employees who are supervised by Brooke have not complained directly to Robin, but have discussed the problem with other employees at the company. Robin's boss has told her that Brooke is a very valuable member of the company. Robin has also overheard upper-level managers describe female employees in derogatory terms. Additionally, it is common knowledge that the CEO of the company is having a "consensual" affair with a Vice President at the company.

What should Robin do? First, identify the issue or issues that are raised by this factual scenario. Second, identify the individuals or groups who might have an interest in this problem, along with the positions that those individuals or groups might take on this problem (making sure to focus in on the facts that are most relevant for each argument or position.) Next, identify any legal issues that you think are raised by this scenario and discuss the potential legal violations. After that, discuss the two primary models of ethical analysis and the course of action that would be preferred by each model. Should both models play a role in our decision-making? What course of action would you recommend and why? Come up with a decision and explain why that decision meets the ethical and legal imperatives of the situation.