Roofing Issues. Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being conscientious and doing good work. Bob knows little about roofing and stays away from all the noise involved. Sally provides her own tools for herself and other workers, sets her own schedule, and charges a flat rate of $10,000 to be paid when the job is completed. Sally hires Trudy, Glen, and Fred to help with the roofing. She pays them an hourly rate, supervises their work, provides them with tools and materials, and sets their schedules. Curious about what is going on there, Bob's friend Spencer walks by the house while the roofing is being done. Glen absentmindedly throws some old shingles off the roof and hits Spencer in the head, resulting in him going to the local emergency room and receiving a couple of stitches in his scalp. Spencer decides to sue all the roofers, Bob, and Sally for his hospital expenses and for pain and suffering. Which of the following is the most likely characterization of Trudy, Glen, and Fred in relation to Sally?

Multiple Choice

• They are both employees and disclosed principals.
• They are undisclosed principals.
• They are independent contractors.
• They are employees.
• They are both employees and independent contractors.

Which of the following was the result on appeal inIglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor, Inc., Etc. v. L.M., the case in the textbook involving the issue of whether a church was liable, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior, for a sexual assault allegedly committed by a church pastor?

Multiple Choice

• The church was not liable under the doctrine ofrespondeat superior, but only because the pastor was immediately fired when his actions came to light.
• The church was liable to the plaintiff under the doctrine ofrespondeat superior.
• The church was liable under the doctrine ofrespondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the pastor sexually assaulted more than one person.
• The church was not liable under the doctrine ofrespondeat superior.
• The church was liable under the doctrine ofrespondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the church had knowledge of at least one sexual assault prior to the plaintiff's but failed to remove the pastor from church assignments.