Rostow Aviation, Ltd. v. Future graphics, Inc. Rostow Aviation, Ltd., entered a contract with Future graphics, Inc., for the design and implementation of a new Web site for Rostow. The Web site was supposed to be up and operational within 60 days of the making of the contract. Future graphics was one week late in the completion of the Web site. Rostow attempted to rescind the agreement, claiming that time was of special importance. The court ruled that it had not been clearly established that time was essential for the completion of the Web site. Because time was not essential to the satisfactory performance of the agreement, Rostow was held to the contract.