Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Sage Dairy leases its milking equipment from Pronghorn Finance Company under the following lease terms. 1. The lease term is 10 years, noncancelable, and requires

Sage Dairy leases its milking equipment from Pronghorn Finance Company under the following lease terms.

1.

The lease term is 10 years, noncancelable, and requires equal rental payments of $28,200 due at the beginning of each year starting January 1, 2017.

2.

The equipment has a fair value and cost at the inception of the lease (January 1, 2017) of $205,207, an estimated economic life of 10 years, and a residual value (which is guaranteed by Sage Dairy) of $18,800.

3.

The lease contains no renewable options, and the equipment reverts to Pronghorn Finance Company upon termination of the lease.

4.

Sage Dairys incremental borrowing rate is 9% per year. The implicit rate is also 9%.

5.

Sage Dairy depreciates similar equipment that it owns on a straight-line basis.

6.

Collectibility of the payments is reasonably predictable, and there are no important uncertainties surrounding the costs yet to be incurred by the lessor.

Prepare the journal entries for the lessee and lessor at January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017 (the lessees and lessors year-end). Assume no reversing entries.

Lessee:

Jan. 1 2017: To record the lease and to record lease payment.

Lessor:

Jan. 1 2017: To record the lease and to record lease payment.

Lessee:

Dec. 31 2017: To record interest and to record depreciation.

Lessor:

Dec. 31 2017.

What would have been the amount capitalized by the lessee upon the inception of the lease if:

(1)

The residual value of $18,800 had been guaranteed by a third party, not the lessee?

(2)

The residual value of $18,800 had not been guaranteed at all?

On the lessors books, what would be the amount recorded as the Net Investment (Lease Receivable) at the inception of the lease, assuming:

(1)

The residual value of $18,800 had been guaranteed by a third party?

(2)

The residual value of $18,800 had not been guaranteed at all?

Suppose the useful life of the milking equipment is 20 years. How large would the residual value have to be at the end of 10 years in order for the lessee to qualify for the operating method? (Assume that the residual value would be guaranteed by a third party.) (Hint: The lessees annual payments will be appropriately reduced as the residual value increases.)

Residual value is greater than/ less than what?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Accounting questions