Scammer hires Expert to build a device to capture data from ATM cards. Scammer provides technical specifications to Expert on specific ATM models that Scammer wants to use the device on, together with security protocols used by the banks that operate those ATM models. Expert builds and delivers the device, but it does not work on all of the ATM models Scammer specified, and Scammer refuses to pay. When Expert sues to enforce the contract: Question 2 options: a) Expert will prevail, because Scammer has no defense for non-payment. b) Scammer will prevail, because the device only meets some of the required criteria and express conditions require strict satisfaction. c) Scammer will prevail, because the contract violates public policy. d) Expert will prevail, but will only be able to recover a portion of the contract price due to the reduced value of the device