Question
scanerio :Misinterpretation Mishap Tony is a project leader at a company frequently subcontracted to produce code for various government entities and affiliates. Traditionally, code that
scanerio :Misinterpretation Mishap
Tony is a project leader at a company frequently subcontracted to produce code for
various government entities and affiliates. Traditionally, code that was developed for one
federal department could be reused for another if approval was obtained by the former.
One day, Tony's company was contacted by a privately-owned commercial corporation,
FlyHigh, to create code for an avionics-related image processing effort. Since the code
requested was almost identical to one used for a past project, Tony's team decided to, once
approval had been obtained from the government, reuse the code.
After permission was granted through email, however, Tony realized the approving
party, a law agency that was contracted by the government, lacked complete
understanding of who would benefit from the reused code.
Tony wanted to contact the government directly to ensure it had been informed of all
vital aspects of the contract but realized doing so could mean having the initial approval
revoked, having to re-code the requested code, and increasing the contract bid up to two
million dollars.
Understanding the contract between his company and FlyHigh was on the line, should
Tony move forward with clarifying the situation to the appropriate party?
What are the legal , professional and employment factor tony is subjected to in this situation. what are legal and professional code of conduct he would be breaking if continues to do so in this ethical dilemma situation
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started