Scenari holia team "fan" read Risk Man Improper Design Everyone Everett v. Bucky Warren, Inc., 380 N.E.2d 653 (Mass. 1978) 1. State the names of the plaintiff and defendant, the volume number, page number and name of the reporter, and the court that decided the case. 2. Describe the facts of the case. 3. What was the cause of action? 4. What was the court's disposition of the case? 5. What was the chain of production and distribution by which the helmet came to plaintiff? 6. On what basis was the designer of the helmet negligent? The school? 7. What happened at the trial court level? 8. What was the court's ruling regarding contributory negligence and assumption of risk defenses for defendants? 9. What factors did the court consider in determining whether the helmet was reasonably safe? 10. Is assumption of risk an appropriate defense for a strict liability claim? Why or why not? 11. As an administrator of a sports program what steps can you take to avoid a situation like that in this case?

Everett v. Bucky Warren, lnc., 390 NE 2d 653 (Mass. 1978) name of the reperter, ad ite court that dectiled the case. 2. Describe the fack of the cous: 3. What was the cause of actient? 4. What was the court's dispesitien of the canet 5. What wes the chein of predectime and diatribeties by which the helmet came to plaiatier? 7. What happened at the trial ceert kevel? 8. What was the court'v nuline regardint evatrituhnn argligence asd assumptien of risk defenses for defendants? 9. Whar facten did the court cobsider ia determiaies whet ber the helmet was reasonably affe? 10. Is asiamptioa of rith an appropriate defene fer a strict liability etaim? Why or why not? 11. As an adminiatrater of a pports pougram mbat stops can you bke to avoid a sifuation fike that in this eave