Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Scenario: Alice brought a training from a website for 2200 AUD Bob brought the same training from the same website for 2000 AUD Both were

Scenario: Alice brought a training from a website for 2200 AUD Bob brought the same training from the same website for 2000 AUD Both were automatically profiled via Cookies, they consented profilation, this is why they have different prices. Assertions to be checked: a. The scenario is an example of automated decision making for GDPR, right? b. The scenario NOT falls under the GDPR Art 22(1) "produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her" as they were able to buy the training. c. The scnario falls under the GDPR Art 22(2)(a) because the pricec is used "entering into, or performance of, a contract" as is the contract of training agreement? or I misinterpred the (a) meaning?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Smith And Roberson Business Law

Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts

18th Edition

0357364007, 978-0357364000

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

4. Greet students at the door to the class every day.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

A greater tendency to create winwin situations.

Answered: 1 week ago