Scenario: Pretend you are a Justice on the State Supreme Court and a plaintiff has filed a case that has made it all the way to your State Supreme Court for review. The pertinent facts of the case are this: A child, age 13, has filed for violation of unfair work practices and cited a federal regulation as his grounds for filing.

• What is the Issue at hand that the court must determine?
• What is the Rule that the court must follow and why?
• Analysis- how is this case similar, or different, from the Hammer v. Dagenhart scenario?
• What is your final Conclusion for the Plaintiff?
• Pay special attention to the issue in this case- Federal vs. State jurisdiction in determining Constitutionality.