Schwarck v. Arctic Cat, Inc. Who was the plaintiff, what happened (the basic facts) and what was the plaintiff's legal claim against the defendant? What was the defendant's argument about why it should not be liable - did the backup alarm function? What was it originally designed to do? According to the opinion, could the design of the backup alarm have been the cause of the accident? What is required to prove that the defendant's conduct (or product) caused the plaintiff's injury? What are at least two scenarios regarding the snowmobile's condition and operation that the appellate court said could have foreseeably caused the accident? Do you agree with the Michigan Court of Appeals decision? Why or why not