Scientists determined that the cause of death in many prawns off the coast of Chile was a nutrient deficiency. So, they set out to determine if the distribution of plants in the ocean near the coast was out of proportion when compared to the ideal environment: 40% Kelp, 25% Phytoplankton, 25% Coral and 10% Other (mostly nutrient-low seaweed). In randomly chosen areas along the coast, they sampled 240 plants. KELP PHYTOPLANKTON CORAL OTHER 84 67 57 32 A)In an ideal environment how many of the 240 plants would you expect to be Kelp? Answer 1Choose...yes1690202Distribution of plants off coast of Chile is not ideal for prawn96noDistribution of plants off coast of Chile is ideal for prawn18493 B)If a goodness of fit test is conducted, what is the null Hypothesis? Answer 2Choose...yes1690202Distribution of plants off coast of Chile is not ideal for prawn96noDistribution of plants off coast of Chile is ideal for prawn18493 C)If a goodness of fit test is conducted, what is the alternative Hypothesis? Answer 3Choose...yes1690202Distribution of plants off coast of Chile is not ideal for prawn96noDistribution of plants off coast of Chile is ideal for prawn18493 D)What is the probability of getting the observed values or values as extreme from the ideal? Round to nearest whole percentage. Answer 4Choose...yes1690202Distribution of plants off coast of Chile is not ideal for prawn96noDistribution of plants off coast of Chile is ideal for prawn18493 E) Is there enough evidence to conclude that the environment for prawns is not ideal? Base this conclusion on p-value and a level of significance ofsignificance of 0.05 or 5%. "yes" or "no